Military Gear & Army Surplus Gear Blog

No progress from S. Korea-Japan military talks over radar dispute

No progress from S. Korea-Japan military talks over radar dispute

senior military officials from Seoul and
Tokyo have been holding a rare meeting to discuss a disputed encounter between
a South Korean warship and a Jap Japanese maritime patrol aircraft but
they came away empty-handed as the two sides couldn’t narrow their deep
differences on the matter can Hong Moo with the details general level representatives from South
Korea and Japan held military talks and Singapore on Monday trying to resolve
their misunderstandings over the dispute about Seoul’s use of military radar in
search-and-rescue operations last month despite the talks lasting over 10 hours
which took place at both nations embassies according to military sources
the two sides only reaffirmed their differences and couldn’t reach any
settlements Tokyo insists a South Korean warship targeted its fire control radar
on the Japanese maritime patrol aircraft on December 20th Saleh denies the claim
saying its worship only used its search radar as the vessel was conducting a
humanitarian mission to rescue a drifting North Korean ship in the East
Sea according to military sources South Korean officials demanded Japan’s
analysis of radar frequency data to verify what kind of radar the warship
used but the Japanese delegation refused to disclose the information in December
South Korea and Japan held a working-level videoconference over the
issue only to confirm their differences a day later Tokyo released video from
the aircraft in a bid to back up its claim solar expressed deep concern and
regret about the video and later came back with its own footage shot from the
warship demanding an apology from Japan for flying toward the ship at a low
altitude and in a threatening manner Monday’s military talks marked the first
face-to-face meeting between officials from the two nations over the radar
dispute Connie mo Arirang news

Reader Comments

  1. Truly S Korean MUST or SHOULD build 55,000 tons of 3-Aircraft Carriers that will COVER 1-for Chinese Side, 2-for Russian Side 3-for escorting HUGE life-blood cargo ships to protect n send pirates to the bottom of the sea [JUST like Russian Navy, which is why ANY nation NAVY dismally failed to understand those sea scm bags of pirates do NOT even try to hijext Russian flags ship n take notice about that, CZ Russian Navy will have NO second thougt, excellent way n the BEST way there is indeed, about shoot n blast pirates ships of ANY size n sink n blast to send the deep bottom of the sea that those pirats deserve NO less indeed!! (Once words traveling around among pirates groups, Somali, Thilands, may be even Philiphen), HOW S Korean Navy is "damb serious about dealing with 'pirates who are trying to hiject LIFE-BLOOD-Survival-S-Korean-cargo-ships-similiar to HOW Russian Navy dealing with pirates, those scm of the earth, pirates "definately" will think twice about EVEN attempt to highjack tens of hundreds of millions dollars of worth S Korean cargo ships that is n MUST on-going to SURVIVE tool for ALL Korean people indeed! STOP bull shits about environment for NOT using nuclear powers as WHOSE got time to making SUCH long voyage escoring ALL different parts of the world! It is rudimentary common sense that is NO time for refuling middle of NO where in the ocean, high waves, stomes, foggy cannot even see 100 feet ahead, n rain n foggy at the SAME time, WHOSE got time to doing refuling, hu? Nuclear power destoyers, at least 4-fourth down as {1-for Japan sise, 1-North Korean side, (not likely use for war as finally N Koean leaders fully understood economic power is everything for surivival indeed! 3-Russian side, 4-5-for Chinee n N Korean sides both AND 2-for "MUST have relieving ships indeed! S Koean econmy can affored to maintian 6-nuclear 15,000 tons of nuclar powered massive destoyers similar to, emulate as much as Korean navy ship builders can, Zumwalt n UK or Frence n designeing case "Italy is one of the best" and espeically UK would help to desing n build nuclear power aircraft carriers MORE than France can as UK or Briton, more likey, England has "ample experince of building aircraft carrier JUST LIKE Germany's ample experince for building submarines, which US has information of building summarine from its her, USA, own, UK, mother country of USA, don't EVER forget, Germany, got all the data after defeaing NAZI Germany, {including the TOP notch rocket, V-2, scientits, but Soviet or Russian dominated, Union got most of 2nd class, but enough, rocket scientitst which was why now defunted Soviet Union had had some impressive rocket lunches, though lots of failures…. S Korean MUST have at bottom of numbers 2-sixty-thousands-of-tons-displacement-size-{got to have BOLD initiative like that Japan will think TWICE or thrice about NOT respecting S Korean Navy indeed!, {all U do pilot build 3-times expansion size of Marado as Chinese do go ahead build massive size n try out n some major faults in following 2nd ship builds as labor costs is FAR n FAR cheaper than US or UK so should be S Korea. Urging S Korea to build at the bottom line number 2-nuclear powered carrier strike, ideally 3, group n starting from China, Japan, n Russia or Ruskies, shall NOT ever EVEN contemplating about "messaging with mighty powerful nuclear powered 2-65,000 ton nuclear powered {even dual power mode; 1-for nuclear reactor, 1-for gas turbine (ask UK's help n she, UK, will glad to do for good profit!) LIKE "hybrid car!" Why not, hu? 1-for nuclear reactor and 2-for gas turbine engine when sailing normal speed! In short, having 2-nuclear powered 65,000, {the same size as China's Liaoning big fishing boat using an aircraft carrier pilot training. S Korean MUST take "bold initiatives, NOT acting LIKE subservient of US Navy telling S Korean what type of ships she, S Korea, can have what types of warships she, Korea, cannot have! The time has come to stand up for her, Korea's, own decision to decide what ships n aircraft carriers are n the size is the BEST for S Korea indeed n so be it!

  2. There is no misunderstanding at all. Korea is just a buck passer. They know they are guilty. That's why they keep silent now.
    Korea should not fake accident any more. Japan is fed up with Korean blackmails. Korea should stop to live on blackmails.
    Japan should breakup relations with Korea.

  3. Unprofessional, CLEARLY provoking manner flight, and most of all, it was UNSAFE flight indeed! If the destroyer ship was Russian naval ship, it is HIGHLY doubtful Japanese patrol plane would EVEN close to the ship, because Russian ships will MOST definately shoot warning shots get the hell out from ship! Japan cannot do anything to Russia as a second most nuclear-powered nation. So, there is despicable Japanese Navy is testing, attempting to testing, n indirectly harassing Korean navy, and the WHOLE reason behind is an attempt to "embarrass n downgrade Korean navy's image in global scale n it is commendable that S Korean Navy n she, S Korea, is NOT backing down an inch!

  4. Time is of the essence n WHOSE got time to refueling n return ships while time is money in business every second n taking dangerous n difficult n requires ANOTHER naval ship to protect VERY VERY VERY vulnerable oil refueling ships either by sailing of EVEN in the middle of refueling, particularly dangerous n easy target by submarine in particular, those escorting NON-nuclear powered destroyers! Having nuclear-powered destroyers, at least have 6-of-them, those LIFE BLOOD cargo ships BACK-n-forth TO S Korea n head out again n back again, and again, and again, … So, having nuclear-powered decoyer ships can ready for doing that lifeblood of S Korean cargo ships for 25 yrs., except for 2-3 months of food replenishment… *** Hugely important indeed!!! A though just came: S Korea SHOULD build her own, SO MUCH SO MUCH SO MUCH hundreds of millions of dollars of saving, VERTICAL-TAKE-OFF-FIGHER-PLANE-TAHT DOES not HAVE TO BE AS GOOD AS F-35, BUT S Korean has HUGE advantage of very very very lower labor costs n all those S Korean engineers n scientist work for very lower wage undertaking vital nation’s defense project like that knowing their works are for defending their mother land, AND they WILL BE GLAD to research, develop, n build Navy's vertical Take Off that can EVEN use in Marado n NEW AT LEAST 2-times bigger, just expand EVERY PART OF Marado to twice of current Marado n cost of failure will be far n far n far cheaper than USA labor n all that related costs n 2-3 times, S Korean can build 35,000 ton mini-(SHOULD BE 65,000 ton size to make some naval statements n there will be ORDERS from other nations that all that costs related research, develops n build will pay off n selling as ONE- PACKAGE of vertical takeoff F-35 cousin will be FOREVER stepping for bold n courageous S Korean NAVY that will at last "surpass Japanese still considers the BEST modern navy in Asia and one of the most modern in the world." Here is protecting UAV underwater so call drone-bomb(s) can be early detected, defend n MOST cases, the vast amount, of damage, will be minimal due to “underwater denotation” and by automatic "underwater detection for incoming, fast speed, for one thing, underwater UAV, but ONE MUST realize that due-2-near-zero gravity, the speed is far slower than in the air, there for "flexible, MORE difficult to rip through than standing still one, composite metal next, bending net is far more difficult to n ALSO slow down under water UAV missiles Ruskies are bragging about, Putin, n if there were 4-different stages of flexible composite build, salt water resistant, net 4-states-in-a-row, underwater missiles of any kind, including nuclear-armed bomb(s) denoted in-water 5-6-7 miles away from any seaport, such damage will be VASTLY minimized damages. HERE IS THE ideal-workable-concepts. 1st stage in 11.5 miles, within any countries own water, detect fast-moving incoming underwater UAV via various underwater 24-7-round-clock-computer monitored underwater-detection systems that will raise aforementioned net in few miles further backward like 8.5 miles (due to near zero gravity condition (underwater is), underwater UAV or torpedo does not matter it is all essentially high tech modern torpedoes,), n the first net failed to "detonate the incoming n follow up UAV or torpedoes, the second n 3rd n 4th aforementioned nets will be automatically raised n 2nd n 3ed net should be able to stop all the incoming torpedoes n underwater missiles n by that time there will be "smashing n devastating retaliation strikes should have been already launched indeed!" MOST economic vital points in port cities like New York, Baltimore, Potomac river may be, San Francisco, Settle, Los Angeles, Florida, Texas, etc. n S Korean cities would be Busan, Inchon, Mokpo, Jeju Islands, etc.

  5. Surprisingly enough, South Korea is still telling the same lie. What kind of deal can we make now? First of all, Korea has to apologize to Japan and to the world for having made such a hostile use of radar to our plane. Then, you have to promise not commit such a stupid attack to us. Watch your attitude!

  6. Nobody expected anything would come out from the meeting. Koreans simply follow anti-Japan national policy. They have not explained what the navy ship without national flag was really doing in the Japan's EEZ area – smuggling something, helping N. Korean escapees, giving some aid material to N. Koreans??? – from Americas

  7. Yep…
    No more scam money from Japan and Japanese people and tax payers.

    No more apologies it took place 75yrs ago. I was not there and you were not there also.

  8. (1) Why is the Korean destroyer rescuing the northern fishing boat that has not issued a rescue signal in Japan's EEZ (Exclusive Economic Zone)?

    (2) Why is the Korean ship acting within the Japanese EEZ without issuing any flag or navy flag?

    (3) Initially, why did you change the fact that "Irradiation is not done" from the way though "I started hitting the patrol aircraft by all radar started?"

    (4) Why was "a radar for search" necessary although a North Korean ship is near the rescue?

    (5) What is the reason why the explanation is going through three times over time?

    (6) Twenty-one countries including South Korea are participating in the "Maritime Collision Avoidance Code (CUES)" agreed in 2014. What are the reasons why firearm control radar irradiation has been confirmed that absolutely should not be done in that?

    (7) If you felt a threat to the flight of the patrol aircraft, why did not you contact / warn with "radio" confirmed in the "Maritime Collision Avoidance Code"?

    (8) Radio communication from the SDF that claims to have failed to hear can be clearly heard even in the video released by the South Korean side. What is the reason for not responding to this?

    (9) Japan and South Korea are in a position to monitor 'Seto' by UN 's economic sanctions against North Korea. Does this Korean act match it?

  9. Although it was not flying threatening, it seems that South Korea showed it as a threat because it was a violation of the resolution of the United Nations and it had been backlogged! Together with South Korea and China, North Korea will not destroy nuclear weapons unless sanctions are implemented in the international community! Again, we should implement UN sanctions against South Korea and China that are violating the UN resolution.

  10. We don’t expect any progresses any more. Had enough with Korean matter. Only good thing is the world people realized that the Korean government and its navy are dishonest and incompetent. Bye bye Moon.

  11. I think Abe…japan prime minister, he is crafty…like fox…trouble maker. he is try to increase japan self-defense forces and military force by using this military provocation against south Korea. He also want to increase his low support rate by using this situation. He is really dangerous guy. He must remember in the past what happened in 1945. I think Japanese elected the wrong leader. If people take the wrong leader, the country can be destroyed. Abe is a very very dangerous man..liar…Japanese's minister is Not honest. is typical Japanese style.

  12. South Korea's president Moon Jae-in helps North Korean spy ship.
    【Radar irradiation incident; How perpetrator Korea pretends to be "Victim"】

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *