Military Gear & Army Surplus Gear Blog

How safe are nuclear weapons?

How safe are nuclear weapons?

Unlike almost any other device created, Nuclear
weapons must abide by the “always/never” rule. They must always work flawlessly when
required, often with just a few minutes notice, they must never accidentally go off, never
get stolen and never be subject to unauthorized use.
So how safe are the ultimate weapons of war from accidental detonation, deliberate sabotage,
been stolen or just human error. From 1953 the US started deploying nuclear
weapons in the US and Europe in a wide variety of guises from bombs to artillery shells,
missiles to handheld atomic demolition devices. This was to counter the perceived threat from
the Soviet Union and also China as it was thought the west just couldn’t match the
size of their armies and keep defense spending under control. Nuclear weapons would be the
west’s centerpiece strategy to keep the piece and win a war if it came to it.
But this proliferation of nuclear devices raised two issues, how safe would they be
from detonation due to accidents and how could the president of the United States maintain
the ultimate control if weapons were scattered across not only the US but other countries
in Europe which had been enemies less than a couple of decades earlier.
Considering the number of nuclear weapons that have been made since 1945, estimates
vary but the number is around 70,000 by up to eight countries around the world, it’s
somewhat of a miracle that up to now there hasn’t been a major nuclear accident somewhere.
Yet since their creation there have been an alarming number of incidents, with fully assembled
multimegaton bombs being struck by lightning, burned to the point of melting, crushed after
they hit the ground at supersonic speeds, lost in the deep oceans and blown apart by
their own explosives or the missiles they were mounted on.
The term “Broken Arrow” is the name given to nuclear weapon accidents, be they accidental
launching, firing, detonating, theft or loss of the weapon. The U.S. admits to having 32
broken arrows worldwide, with six nuclear weapons having been lost and never recovered.
But the number of incidents from small issues like weapons being dropped or being misplaced
for a while was well over 1000. One saving grace is that to unintentionally
make a nuclear weapon to explode properly and to deliver its designed yield is quite
difficult compared to a conventional explosive device.
TNT, one of the most common high explosives is stable enough so that it can be melted
and poured into shells and can withstand the acceleration from the gun barrel but it will
explode if a detonator is used. An atom bomb or fission bomb is different,
but the basic principle of its operation is quite simple.
There are two basic types, one is a gun type, here two sub subcritical fissionable components,
usually uranium 235 are fired into each other creating a critical mass and a nuclear explosion,
the Hiroshima device or “Little Boy” was a gun-type bomb.
The Nagasaki bomb code named “Fat Man” was the second type, an implosion bomb. Here
a hollow sphere of Plutonium, called a pit after the stone seed in the center of a peach
is surrounded by a high explosive lens which focuses the explosion inward on to the pit.
When this lens is correctly detonated a symmetrical shockwave compresses the Plutonium pit enough
to initiate a chain reaction and a nuclear explosion occurs.
The timing of the explosive lens is critical to nuclear detonation occurring. In the original
Trinity test, the bomb had 32 high explosive segments that surrounded the pit. Each one
of these had to be triggered within 1 microsecond or less to ensure the shockwave was symmetrical
all around the core. Later developments reduced this to two explosive hemispheres.
If the triggering to any one of the segments was delayed or the explosive had irregularities
or air bubbles in it, the shockwave would not be symmetrical and the bomb will fizzle
rather than explode. A Thermonuclear bomb or Hydrogen Bomb is even
more difficult to detonate, here a fission bomb is used to implode a capsule of fusion
fuel, hydrogen in the form of Lithium-6 deuteride before igniting it, so both processes have
work correctly for the hydrogen bomb to work as designed.
Because even a small partial fission event could lead to a very large explosion, a safety
protocol called “one point safety” was introduced. A nuclear weapon is deemed to
is one-point safe if, when the High Explosive inside the weapon is accidentally detonated
at any single point, the probability of producing a nuclear yield exceeding the equivalent of
2kg TNT is less than 1 in one million, so safety measures were built in to the bombs
to stop an accidental nuclear explosion. In the “Little Boy” bomb, which was a
gun-type weapon, 4 bags of cordite provided the propellant charge required to fire one
fissile component into another. These were inserted once the bomb was in flight and on
its way to the target. One problem with this type of device was that if it ended up in
water like the sea, it would have a moderating effect and could cause a criticality event
even if the bomb was not damaged. The gun-type weapons were soon limited to artillery shells
due to their smaller size but eventually, their use was discontinued
Several methods were used in the early implosion type bombs to stop an accidental detonation.
The early bombs used a solid plutonium core which would only be placed in the bomb when
it was ready for use, without it there could not be a nuclear explosion.
Later types used the hollow core design as this produced a bigger bang for less nuclear
material but they were not removable, these were called sealed pit devices and possed
a greater threat as they were ready to go at any time.
To make these safe, one idea was to fill the hollow pit with steel balls which would disrupt
the symmetrical implosion required to reach criticality. These would be removed before
use by letting them fall out into a container under the plane, they could be reinserted
by rotating the bomb and filling it from the top if it returned.
Another method involved filling the hollow pit with a fine chain of a material that absorbed
neutrons like cadmium. The chain would also act like the steel balls by stopping a symmetrical
implosion. But the military was more worried about the
reliability of the bombs to explode when required than the 1 in a million chance of an accidental
explosion and so additional safety measures were resisted for a long time.
Something that didn’t help was a safety feature developed by the Livermore lab for
their W-47 warhead in 1958 which was found not to be one point safe and was used in all
the Polaris submarine missiles. Because of a moratorium of testing at the time, the design
could not the furthered by nuclear tests. So to make the bomb safer, a variation of
the cadmium chain, a cadmium and boron wire was inserted into the pit, this would absorb
the neutrons and stop a reaction. During the arming process, this wire would
be pulled out a by a small motor to make the bomb live. However, it was found that over
time that the wire corroded inside the pit and got stuck or became brittle and broke
off inside. The motor was too small and weak to pull it out if it got stuck so the bomb
would not work when required. Eventually, about 75% of the warheads that were part of
the guaranteed retaliation in case of a Soviet first strike were found to be duds and all
the warheads had to be replaced with a new warhead design which incensed the Navy.
Fire was also an issue, although 23 weapons had been involved in fires and none had exploded
that didn’t mean that number 24 wouldn’t be the one ending in a mushroom cloud. One
of the designers at Sandia National lab, Bob Peurifoy found out about an explosive that
had been around since 1888 called 1,3,5-triamino- 2,4,6 trinitrobenzene or TATB.
This was so hard to detonate it wasn’t even classified as an explosive but as a flammable
solid. It could be hammered, dropped, set on fire, crashed at high speed and not detonate.
It was ten times less sensitive to shock compared to the existing high explosives but with the
right type of detonator, it could produce a shockwave almost as comparable. Eventually,
this would replace the conventional explosives used and make an accidental detonation even
more unlikely In Some weapons that had been involved in
fires when planes had crashed, for example, the plutonium-oralloy core had literally melted
as it has a relatively low melting point of 640 C and jet fuel burns at 980 C. Although
this didn’t pose an explosion risk it did pose a radiation risk if the highly radioactive
plutonium got into the air as dust and smoke. So Later warheads were fitted with a Fire
Resistant Pit or FRP, a high-melting-point metal shell that can withstand prolonged exposure
to a jet fuel fire and the corrosive action of molten plutonium. So whilst the plutonium
itself may melt, it would remain contained within the encasing shell and not be dispersed
into the environment. To avoid a detonation of a bomb that might
have been accidentally armed but might still be on the ground, environmental sensing devices
or ESDs were fitted. One of these is the trajectory switch, this detects when the warhead of falling
along a trajectory as it would if dropped from a plane or launched in a missile. Others
include barometric sensors to detect its altitude, piezoelectric sensors in the nose to detect
it had hit the ground or radar to measure its distance from the ground. All of these
would have operate in the correct sequence for the bomb to detonate
So whilst a detonation in an accident would very difficult to achieve that doesn’t mean
an accidental detonation couldn’t occur if all the correct arming and firing procedures
happened but in an unintended way. Early bombs were armed with a single high
energy electrical pulse generator when a weapon is released from its delivery vehicle but
this wasn’t safe as it was first thought. Just to prove that a simple random event could
have far-reaching consequences, a crew removing four Mark 28 thermonuclear bombs from a B-47
bomber found that they were all armed. After a seven-month investigation, it turned out
that a tiny metal nut had come off a screw somewhere and lodged against an unused radar
heating circuit and the arming circuit, creating a new unintended circuit and accidentally
armed the bombs. So the designers came up with the idea that
instead of a single pulse to arm the weapons, a series of on/off pulses in a code that couldn’t
be replicated by a random event like shorted wire should be used instead.
There was also another reason for a coded system. Although most of the nuclear warheads
were owned by the US, many were in other countries in the NATO alliance. Because it was easy
to arm the early nuclear devices, the power to use them could reside much lower down the
chain of command and in other countries effectively on trust alone. A disgruntled commander or
pilot or even a government could use them for their own purposes without the knowledge
of the US. By making bombs code enabled the authorization and control of their use would
come back to the US President. This coding system was called a Permissive
Action Link or PAL and would make it extremely difficult to arm a lost or stolen weapon without
the appropriate code being entered. It would take intimate knowledge of the design of the
bomb to try and hotwire it, something which was a closely guarded secret.
The early PAL’s were mechanical and didn’t always work reliably, their batteries had
a tendency to run flat with little notice and the mechanics were noisy enough that a
skilled technician could work out the code by listening to the clicks it made.
Eventually, these would be replaced with computerized systems and buried deep within the bomb itself
with extra security collectively called the “strong/weak” link. If any attempt to
arm the device was not made in the exact sequence either during an accident or deliberately
then the firing mechanism would be permanently disabled.
So as we come to today the problems of safety and security have been overcome and as a result,
there have been no unwanted nuclear detonations. As an extra layer of safety In modern missile
system, the targets are not preloaded, so in the unlikely event of an unauthorized launch,
the default target would be somewhere in the nearest ocean. Only when an authorized launch
command is sent is the target set. So what your thoughts on the safety and security
of nuclear weapons, let me know in the comments and don’t forget to check out some of our
other videos when you get the time. So thanks for watching and please subscribe,
thumbs up and share.

Reader Comments

  1. I Love nuclear weapons.the bigger the better. let's destroy ourselves. humanity is doing well. keep it up

  2. 1:00 West's way to keep the peace? US is the first and only state to have and use nukes in a war against civilian population.

  3. 2:20 Actually, the loss of a FUNCTIONING US nuclear weapon (as opposed to its accidental destruction by falling from an aircraft, or in a non-nuclear detonation or a fire) is called an "Empty Quiver" as opposed to a "Broken Arrow". Hence the John Travolta movie "Broken Arrow" should really have been called "Empty Quiver", for that is what happens in the movie. "Bent Spear" refers to any untoward incident involving a US nuclear weapon.

  4. I wonder whether Russia still cooperates in informal detargeting of their strategic nuclear weapons (aiming them at the ocean by default). Russia's policy since about 1999, has been "escalate to de-escalate" – in which nuclear attack of enemy homeland leadership and military command centers happens when Russia starts to lose a non-nuclear war. The US and Russia both denounced the Intermediate Nuclear Forces treaty after Russia violated it with two of their nuclear weapon systems.

  5. So US is worried about Iran but they had 32 broken arrow cases with 6 nukes lost permanently… Wow just wow

  6. As fucked as the whole "bigger stick" thing is – at least they are safer now than they ever have been.

  7. Pretty dang safe, I'd say at this point. No "miracle" involved. They're very fragile. Any damage and they cannot kaboom. Their very complexity is their biggest safety feature.

  8. Little Boy was indeed only armed when Enola Gay was airborne, not because of orders, but rather because Parsons was concerned it might explode in the event of a crash, so disobeyed his orders and armed it in the air.

  9. only a sick mind would want to play this game and it looks like there are a number out there that want to play thank you for this information this really dose not make me feel more safe but helps to understand that there is a bit of safety built in

  10. Don't worry….Trump says "I know more than the generals" HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Thanks for the ongoing, never-ending, continual, non-stop, ceaseless laughs and entertainment America!

  11. The presentation seems to focus on the safeguards in place for the US nuclear arsenal. It says nothing about the safeguards in place for the nukes in other countries. Pakistan is the most worrisome as their nukes could fall into the hands of Islamic extremists.

  12. They had the know-how the solve such a complex puzzle as a creating a fusion bomb, and the stupidity to think that simply completing an electrical circuit would be a safe enough arming mechanism. Unbelievable. Trust, destroyed.

  13. I feel somewhat safe after listening to all these safety and precaution in place but it only takes one angry stupid president to end most living creatures on Earth.

  14. Imagine if computers and phones were also designed not to have errors. Even in this age Windows 10 and hardware can be so unreliable!

  15. Probably not safe enough. Obama tried to borrow one and was told no. However, there is one missing off the coast South Carolina and it been thee for quire a while. Here’s an accidental of unexplored nuke drop over a home Why do we need nuclear weapons? It seems like the old fashioned kind work pretty good.

  16. If something can go wrong, it will. And who knows? something might have went wrong but was cleverly covered up. Good vid though

  17. In movies they show evil people ceeates most dangerous wapons like hydra …but in real world its USA 🤭🤭😝

  18. I'm just glad nukes are not easy to make or use, if they were you know we would have already destroyed our selves as a species.

  19. The only safe nuclear weapon is a non-existent one. Though we may need them to neutralize asteroids in the 100 to 300m class which are eager to have a high speed chat with Earth.

  20. how safe are they? well to me they are the safest! as i live in Brazil, a country that has none, so yeah…

  21. The audiobook "Command and Control" by Eric Schlosser will scare the crap out of you. You will learn all about the close calls we had. I believe "Curious Droid" had to get some of his data from this book. It's a story mostly about the Damascas Titan II underground missile explosion. But the author goes into the history of almost all the other close calls we had. Most of the discussions in the above video are discussed in the book, "Command and Control". Listen to it, or read it if you have the time. If you wish to keep yourself sane while driving in traffic download the book to your cell phone. You won't regret it. I've listened to it many times, over and over again, each time learning something new.

  22. It shoul NOT be in hand of USA as they used it twice.hands of wrong people will kill innocent people. Like USA use against little Japan. 😔

  23. Great video as usual! So, basically, all nuclear weapons are safe right up until the point that they become really, really dangerous. Or maybe it’s the weapons that are safe and the people using them that are dangerous.

  24. The safest nuclear weapon is NO NUCLEAR WEAPONS.
    This may sound a bit childish but the fact is that it is thinking human beings that made them, if we take that to one step further it comes to one more step in the thinking department, and the stupidity of blowing each other to kingdom come becomes very clear..
    One would have thought that this would have been thought of by those clever people at the top who make these things, i.e. if we dont make them there is no threat from them.
    There is and always has been the ability to sit down and talk, this should by now be the real method of keeping the world safe, and anyone who wants to spit the dummy and walk away from the talks, being removed from office by the country they represent and replaced with someone less inflamable.
    There is no worse picture of the worlds situation than today where one country considers it can dominate the rest ,a very clear message that we have a situation as above, but the people need to wake up to the treat it applies to them, andvdo something about it.

  25. distrtion i synchronisation (2uS), fluctiations etc. to detonate other way no boom …… soo why that ~4 min talking after (some safty deigns) for actidental crash, fire, part of exlosive detonation ? if 1/6 explosive sphere around core will axdental first explode …..big nuke boom will not happend ..nuklear material will be all over place

  26. Due to cut backs in the British army we are selling some old stock off
    Please look on e bay for product description
    All nuclear weapons are sold with a garentee or your money back
    Some products may be faulty if the product goes of premature please return with in 28 days for your money back garentee

  27. Sounds like nuclear weapons are safe…..until they are not. How many times have we told ourselves something could not happen and then the impossible happens? Lots. Batteries fail, electronics corrode, something is dropped, a computer code is flawed….the possibilities are endless.

    My ultimate challenge to you is the case of North Korea. Here is a country that is so desperately poor that they can barely afford to keep the lights on. And yet, they have managed to develop nuclear weapons (with help, of course). I bet their arming systems and triggers are perfectly safe….right?

    Anyway, food for thought. Next video……a study of when impossible things happen.

  28. How about a video on safety of AGR power stations, such as Hinckley B and Heysham, which had some sort unplanned outage yesterday? It seems the loud "pops", heard over 7 miles away, were just steam being vented, but with a new extension of life for EDF, some people are worrying.

  29. The weapons mechanisms are safe, you've got that right! The danger lies on who's hands those weapons are. During WWII I saw a documentary on Discovery Channel the US had dispatched a B-17 with one of them to Europe but it never made it past NYC 'cause it crashed on the Empire State building. I have never been able to verify if this was true but I have my doubts because nowadays Discovery Channel has been publishing content lacking scientific evidence.

  30. One wonders what level of protection from inadvertent detonation do other states use as there is no public knowledge available. Also, how the political and military controls are configured that would enable a commander to activate the PALs besides a head of state does raise a cause for concern.

  31. That these weapons exist at all is a glaring indictment on humanity. Makes me want to puke, what’s wrong with a species that would pour so may resources into devices to destruct itself. FUBAR

  32. 11:20 Imagine being one of those maintenance crews and discovering that the thermonuclear warhead you just unloaded accidentally armed itself. "Sir would you excuse for a sec? I just need to get a new set of pants."

  33. But how save are they to not actualy explode when wanted? I mean it would be pretty unsave for the targeted people if someone decided to launch one on them..

  34. Hellishly Dangerous.. don't fancy chemical or biological either ,thank you very much.. USA had developed nuke hand grenades in the mid 50s fired off rifles and 'green' nukes ..low radiation ,high heat ,high shockwave.. unreal ..

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *