Military Gear & Army Surplus Gear Blog

Brief History of the Royal Family

Brief History of the Royal Family


1066! The start of the royal family on these
fair isles. Well, there were kings and mini countries before that and druids before that,
and Pangaea before that, but we have to start somewhere and a millennia ago is plenty far
— if that leaves out Æthelred the Unready, so it goes. William the Conqueror, conquered in the ‘Norman
Conquest’ — Norman here being code for *French*. Because it’s the olden days, people had lots
of kids, but to keep things simple this family tree is going to leave out many of them on
each branch because not every child matters. So William had three kids we care about: William
II, Henry I and Adela. If you’ve seen the video about royal succession
— click here if you haven’t — you’ll know that formal rules for passing on the crown
will get established, but for now, it’s a free-for-all, home team advantage to the eldest
son, but never forget bigger-army diplomacy. Upon William the Conquerors death, William
II became king. William II didn’t marry, and on a bros day
out with Henry died in a ‘Hunting Accident’ that gave Henry I the crown. Henry I had at least 26 children of which
only two were 100% legit. He declared his daughter would rule next (after his son died
in a ship wreck) and swore his knights to honor Empress Matilda by crossing their hearts,
hoping to die, sticking a needle in their eye — *but* when Henry I died while Matilda
was in France, many ignored this while her cousin Stephen raced to Westminster using
faster army diplomacy to get coronated first. Empress Matilda did eventually return and
start a decades-long civil war — that was pretty much a stalemate because turtling in
the 1100s was an effective RTS tactic. While she did rule part of the island, as
Matilda never had an official coronation, her monarchical status is disputed. Now, as Stephen’s children were either dead,
disinterested, or a nun — his crown went to his nephew, Henry II who had four sons:
Henry the Young, Richard the Lionheart, King John… and Geoff. (Guess who died before
his turn?) Henry II saw the history thus far of conquering,
assassination, (maybe) usurpation, attritional war — and decided waiting until after the
death of the current king before sorting out the *next* king didn’t work. So Henry II changed the system and crowned
Henry the Young co-king with him, invoking the rule of two: one is none. Two is one.
If it’s important, you need a backup. It was a good plan for stability, helped by
the young King’s popularity, but unfortunately — the apprentice rebelled against the master,
rallying his brothers — which resulted in another civil war of disputed monarchs during
which Henry the Young died of dysentery, Henry the Elder died of fever, and Richard I took
the crown. After Richard came John and four eldest son
successions in a row: John to Henry III (insert Magna Carta here) to Edward I (Longshanks)
to Edward II — to Edward III. Actually Ed II was overthrown by Isabelle
of France A.K.A the She-Wolf of France A.K.A. his wife. After deposing her husband, she
acted as regent for their son. Every one of these arrows glosses over a bit of complexity. Edward III had five sons: Edward the Black
Prince, Lionel, John, Edmund, and Thomas, none of which would wear the crown. When Edward III died, his throne would have
gone to The Black Prince, but he was dead at the time so the crown went to his boringly
named son Richard, now the second. There’s a bunch of drama lamma stuff around
Richard the second which your English teacher might force you to read about — but spoiler
alert, history’s ending is always the same: bigger-army diplomacy, this time from Henry
IV who gets the crown and Richard II gets starvation in captivity. Another Henry before we get to the War of
the Roses: A war that strikes terror (and boredom) in
the minds of students of history the nation over who have to deal with *this* family tree
‘simplified’ to explain why everyone was angry, but the shortest version ever is Edward III’s
great, great, grandsons duked it out, even though one of them was dead for part of the
fight — but we can’t get into that now so Henry VI to Edward IV to Henry VI to Edward
IV. The end. Edward IV, on his deathbed left his crown
to his son. But being twelve he needed protection, so Richard, his best-ist uncle in the world,
promised to take super-good care of him. Edward V then promptly disappeared under suspicious
circumstances that left Richard to become Richard the third. But he didn’t stay king for long because Edward
III’s great, great, great, great grandson Henry VII — took the crown, put a ring on
Elizabeth of York to lock down that royal legitimacy and then sired Henry VIII — splitter
of churches, and ladies. Henry VIII thought it was high time to formalize
the rules of inheritance, so he wrote them out in his will — basically saying oldest
boys first, girls only if there aren’t any boys — and Parliament approved the rules. Which should have made everything neat and
tidy, but we’re about to enter the really messy time… … Because Henry’s son lived just long enough
to screw it up — inheriting the throne at 9 there was, of course, a scheming protectorate
running things, yet he still declared at 15 that his father’s rules were dumb and his
sisters were dumb and that his first cousin once removed, Lady Jane Grey, should be the
next monarch instead. Then he died and Lady Jane Grey became queen
at sweet sixteen, sort of — in a disputed status way for nine days, until beheaded by
Mary, the first really, truly officially nobody doubts it Queen. Mary didn’t have any kids, and passed the
crown to Elizabeth I who became the second queen in a row… to also not have children.
But, no problem because Lady Jane Grey was next in … oh. Right. Now, this is the point at which we acknowledge,
Scotland Exists. They’d been doing their own royal thing which for our purposes joins the
English branch where Edward III’s great granddaughter married into it in the 1400s and then goes:
James, James, James, James, James, Mary Queen of Scotts, James. Bringing us back to the
1600s. Henry the VIII’s sister importantly also married
into this line of the family giving it English legitimacy points in the eyes of the English
Parliament, which asked to borrow Scotland’s James, making him king of two countries with
two numbers in his name depending on where you’re counting from. James had a son, Charles I, and you might
think this unification of the monarchs means the very messy time is over. But no. Because Cromwell. Cromwell didn’t like kings and beheaded Charles
I: declaring no royals no longer, making himself The Lord Protector which was in no way like
a king — even though he was in charge and it was a hereditary office passed to his son. But the Cromwells didn’t last — mainly because
his son was a fancy country squire who didn’t follow rule 0: keep the army happy — giving
Charles’s son, Charles II, the ability to reestablish the monarchy. Charles II had lots of children, all of which
were illegitimate, leaving his brother, James II next in line. But James II was *Catholic*
and ever since Henry split the church, Catholics had terrible approval ratings. But conveniently,
he had nice Protestant daughters, one married to a Dutch Prince who by the nature of these
things was the grandson of Charles I. Bonus English legitimacy points, plus, who doesn’t
like the Dutch? With James so unpopular and William and Mary
so popular, the army and nobles pretty much invited the royal couple to ‘invade’ and James
II fled. William and Mary ruled as co-monarchs, but
without children the crown went to Queen Anne, who also didn’t produce any heirs, though
not from lack of effort — she was pregnant *seventeen* times. Again, finding themselves with a no-royals-no-longer
situation, Parliament decided it was really, truly seriously the time to sort out the rules
of inheritance to avoid pretenders from every branch of this messy tree fighting over the
crown. Parliament did a royal reboot to clear the
cruft, defining Sophia of Hanover — the granddaughter of James dual numbers to be the new starting
point for all claims to the crown. These rules finally stuck, thus ending the
very messy time. George I, son of Sophia, was the first king
under the new rules, then his son George II, to George III, and even though he lost America
and his mind, never fear, the rules are here, so the crown continued to calmly descend the
family tree, going to George IV, who didn’t have any surviving children, to William IV
who had ten children — all illegitimate, then passing through his dead younger brother
to Queen Victoria who started her reign in 1837 and made it to just over the finishing
line of the 20th century. Which is a doubly impressively long time given the state of
medical technology then. After the end of her age, the crown went to her son Edward
VII to George V… to Edward VIII who *finally* breaks up this
neat and tidy (and somewhat boring) line of succession by committing a scandal: marrying
a commoner. An American Commoner! An American Commoner *divorcee*! *twice over* ::Gasp:: Actually, the divorces were a real problem
and weren’t compatible with the Monarch’s role as Head of State *and also* the Church
of England in the 1930s. Edward abdicated to his brother George VI — who was reluctant
to take the crown, and then had to oversee World War II and the subsequent breakup of
the British Empire — which drained the reluctant King’s health, who died at 56 leaving the
crown to Elizabeth the Second, in 1952 at the age of 25. Seven years older than Victoria,
her great great grandmother was on her coronation day, but in early September, 2015, Elizabeth
became the longest-reigning Queen in not just British history, but world history. From Elizabeth II the crown continues on to
Charles, the longest heir apparent in British history, to his son William, to his son George. And that, is a brief history of the royal
family.


Reader Comments

  1. At 2:40 hat does he mean by he was dead “at the time” he makes it sound like he came back too life

  2. I am not sure if the monarchs know where they came from without these YouTube dissection videos. Most people don't recall both their grandmother's maidan name.

  3. You should redo this starting with the Anglo Saxons and Danish struggles. Todays royal line can be traced back to that time as well through Edward the Confessor. Could even take a look at William the conquerors paternal line through Normandy and into the Viking conquests.

  4. Let's start again from 927-2019. The House of Wessex ruled England from 927-1066 with a short interlude from the House of Denmark.

    The list of the early Kings of England;

    Athelstan, Edmund I, Eadred, Eadwig, Edgar the Peaceable, Edward the Martyr, Ethlered the Unready, Svein Forkbeard, Edmund Ironside, Cnut, Harold Harefoot, Harthacnut, Edward the Confessor and Harold Godwinson.

  5. 3:37 he made a mistake.Henry VII wasn't Edward III great-great-great-great-great grandson.Henry VII was Edward III's great-great-great grandson

  6. What is this fheery crap where is the substance and truth? Of coarse this is the trash YT promoted!

  7. the current monarch are scottish directly from the scottish line through king james VI, the first king of the uk. the english line died out with elizabeth in 1603.
    so you did the wrong line of kings lol

  8. So the Queen's Great-Great-Great-Great-Great-Great-Great-Great-Great-Great-Great-Great-Great-Great-Great-Great-Great-Great-Great-Great-Great-Great-Great-Great-Great-Great-Great Grandfather was William the Conqueror

  9. How great they able to know about their family background since 1066. I really want to know about mine too.

  10. That's actually good information my knowledge as for kings and queens starts with the tutors and ends with Elizabeth II had no idea about all the other kings with 10 children or better that couldn't even take this wrong and shows a whole lot of infidelity

  11. 0:55. What I want to know is, what makes a child “legit”. Please correct me if I’m wrong. The king’s first wives first born son will be the next king. If there are no sons it goes to his daughter, if his children are catholic they are also ineligible. If there are no living children/grandchildren, it goes to the kings next oldest brother, son, or grandson, again apply both previous rules. They keep going up the line until they find a match.

  12. This is an absolute nightmare to either understand, much less make sense of. Why anybody needs this information is beyond me. I almost had an anxiety attack halfway through, so I turned it off. I would rather scoop out my eyes with a spork than watch this again.

  13. Why were Wallis Simpson's divorces a problem when the Church of England was created so a king could get divorced?

  14. Another thing is if Henry 1 had 26 children then there are probably hundreds of not thousands of people alive today that are direct descendants of this man that have no idea. Damn

  15. william william henry stephen henry richard john oi
    henry ed ed ed rich 2 and three more henrys join our song
    edward edward rich the third
    henry henry ed again
    mary one
    good queen bess
    jimmy jimmy charles and then
    jim will mary
    anne gloria
    george george george george
    will victoria
    edward george edward george six and queen liz two completes the mix

  16. British people were the dumbest people in world history…. FUCK U BRITISHERS FUCK YOUR QUEEN ELIZABETH AND FUCK YOUR ENTIRE DYNASTY 😂😂😂 #fuck #british

  17. Who cares about this shit? Why is this taught in schools
    "Fail to learn history, doomed to repeat it"
    Yea but that applies to important shit like WW2. Who gives a fuck about moldy lineages

  18. imagine u coming into class explaining ur family tree and then some royal-ass kid comes after you and just plays a youtube video

  19. william i
    william ii
    henry i
    stephen i
    william
    matilda
    eustace
    marie
    william
    henry ii
    henry the young
    richard i / lionheart
    geoffrey
    john
    henry iii
    edward i / longshanks
    edward ii
    she-wolf of france
    edward iii
    edward the black prince
    richard ii
    lionel of antwerp
    john of gaunt
    john beaufort
    joan beaufort
    /scottish/
    james i
    james ii
    james iii
    james iv
    james v
    mary queen of scotts
    /scottish ends/
    john beaufort
    /henry vii mother/
    henry iv
    henry v
    mary
    edmund of langley
    richard of conisburgh
    ricard plantagenet
    edward iv
    richard iii
    elizabeth of york
    edward v
    thomas woodstock
    henry vii
    mary tudor
    henry viii
    francis brandon
    lady jane grey
    edward vi
    elizabeth i
    mary i
    james i /james vi of scotland/
    elizabeth
    sophia of hanover
    charles i
    charles ii
    james ii /james vii of scotland/
    james iii /james viii of scotland
    mary princess of orange
    william prince of orange
    mary ii
    anne
    william
    george i
    george ii
    frederick
    george iii
    george iv
    frederick
    william iv
    edward
    victoria
    edward vii
    george v
    edward viii
    george vi
    elizabeth ii
    /futher/
    charles iii
    william v
    george vii

    8 williams,8 henrys,3 charles',1 stephen,1 victoria,1 matilda,1 eustace,1 marie,2 fredericks,1 anne,3 marys,7 georges,9 edwards,1 lady,4 elizabeths,8 james',3 johns,1 edmund,1 francis,1 thomas,1 she-wolf,1sophia and 3 richards on here

  20. you forgot alfred the great,edward the elder,aethelstan,edmund,eadred or edward,edmund,eadred or edward,harold and edward the confessor but its related to william i because aethelred the unready married to emma and emma had a sibiling called rober who was the father of william i

  21. George IV didn't die of stress. He died of lung cancer from smoking like a chimney, along with his mother and a LOT of other relatives. That's why ER-II has never had anything to do with it. She's buried dozens of her family members of the years because of cigarettes.

  22. You English people are too complicated. Us German and Russian people just have a revolt and be done with it.

  23. The Royals.. NOT Windsors but Sachsen Gotha German Line !!! They are a fraud in my book ! Now they are letting commoners marry their worn out whoring sons to stop the Inbreeding !

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *